Laboratory position
Version mappings, preserve epistemic status, and test improper scope expansion.
Research question
How can a taxonomy, standard, or external framework qualify risk without being allowed to redefine the internal canon?
Evaluation axes
- Separate external authority, canonical authority, and operational decision.
- Trace every transformation and non-match.
- Fail explicitly when a projection expands scope.
Boundaries and non-claims
- A mapping is not normative equivalence.
- An external framework does not become the source of the canon.
- No compliance verdict is published.
Authority allocation
gautierdorval.com carries authorship, the canonical definition, and doctrinal status. InferensLab carries only program scope, its public protocol, and the state of its evidence.